OnlyFans Faces Lawsuit Over Deceptive Practices in Paid Chats

Two Illinois residents, M. Brunner and J. Fry, have filed a class-action lawsuit against OnlyFans alleging deceptive practices that affect subscribers. The plaintiffs say that, despite paying for personal chats with content creators, many interactions were handled by third-party employees hired by agencies rather than by the creators themselves, undermining the platform’s promise of authentic, direct access.

The lawsuit contends that OnlyFans allowed such outsourcing to occur without transparent disclosure, raising questions about consumer trust and the authenticity subscribers expect when paying for premium interactions.

AI-powered tools are being presented by some developers as alternatives for creators and agencies seeking greater transparency. One such product, Stimulus, is described by its developers as an AI Sales Assistant tailored for OnlyFans that automates and enhances fan conversations while mimicking a creator’s personal communication style.

The company behind Stimulus says the tool can provide 24/7 engagement, personalized content recommendations and automated sales processes, aiming to reduce manual workload while maintaining consistent, personalized dialogue and clearer, data-driven transparency compared with opaque outsourcing practices cited in the lawsuit.

Creators and agencies promoting the tool say it can handle immediate replies and promotional campaigns to help preserve direct-to-fan relationships and scale earnings. More information is available at https://only-fans.ai.

Start now

https://client.only-fans.ai/

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *